«After days and nights of incredible labour and fatigue, I succeeded in discovering the cause of […] life; nay, more, I became myself capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless matter».
—Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus, Mary Shelley (1818)
In 2018, we will celebrate 200 years of the first edition of “Frankenstein, or the modern Prometheus”, the fruit of the genius and creativity of a young Mary Shelley . In her book, influenced by Galvani and Volta’s contemporary electrophysiology experiments, she suggested endowing lifeless matter with “vital warmth” or “a spark of life”, creating the myth of Frankenstein we know today.Many have tried to find life-like properties in inert matter. The constituents of living organisms are no different from those found in inanimate objects, but they have properties that allow us to classify them as such. For example, living systems self-organise, grow and replicate in constant interaction with their environment. And above all, they move. “Purposeful motion”, whether it is to grow, transport nutrients or respond to stimuli, is an attribute we associate with “animated” beings ever since Aristotle. When in 1828 the botanist Robert Brown first reported the jiggling of pollen grains floating on water, he thought that this activity was due to a “vital force” that animated matter . Einstein’s explanation of Brown’s observations (known today as Brownian motion) removed the vitalist idea that random motion was a sole property of living organisms and correctly assigned its cause to heat . For example, thanks to this thermal movement, air particles you are breathing can reach the speeds of a jet plane (but they don’t get very far because they collide with each other constantly). And they do so without spending energy, for free!
Although not everything that moves is alive, it could still be active matter if it moves autonomously and consumes energy. A rock is not active. Pollen particles diffuse in water, and still, are not active. But a bacterium is active. A new research area has emerged at the interface of the physical and biological sciences that studies active matter. Active systems remain out of thermodynamic equilibrium by consuming energy in the environment (or internally stored) to move. Far from boring thermodynamic equilibrium (this is a state where things don’t change, i.e. no flow of matter or energy), active particles interact with each other to form new collective phenomena that we still do not understand. Active systems are around us: from flocks of birds, school of fish or bacteria colonies, to humans. One of the astonishing properties of active materials is that they exhibit unexpected features when they consume energy and this occurs at different length scales, e.g. leaderless birds form sudden synchronised flocks in the sky and cytoskeletons self-assemble complex structures in the cell.Active matter has now gone beyond the realm of biology, as synthetic versions of it are also possible in the laboratory, by using both artificial and biological components. A pioneering example of synthetic active matter consists of using the building blocks of our cytoskeleton (literally “skeleton of the cell”), called microtubules, and link them with molecular motors to form an active medium encapsulated in a vesicle. After supplying a molecular fuel called adenosine triphosphate (ATP), these interlinked microtubules fold, buckle and form spontaneous patterns like the ones in Figure 1 a.
Another important class of active matter systems is that of chemically active particles. These synthetic particles achieve self-propelled motion via the catalytic reaction of a fuel in their environment. A notable example (shown in Figure 1.b) developed in New York University (NYU) consists of asymmetric particles of haematite, an iron oxide mineral, inside a spherical polymer (the name of these particles is Janus, like the Roman two-faced god) . In the presence of fuel and some light, these particles catalyse a reaction causing the particles to move around spontaneously, forming groups of particles like a flock of birds in the sky. Without fuel or light, particles stop their activity and ungroup. These “living particles” have opened up a new research area in materials science, and have inspired many other types of “swimming” particles, such as the micro rockets in Figure 1.c .
But how small can self-propelled particles be? And how can we observe them at the nanoscale? These are exciting open scientific questions. So far, the scientific community has achieved synthetic nanomotors of several tens of nanometres (the thickness of a hair is approximately 100,000 nanometres). In our laboratory, we have developed new ways to make even smaller nanomotors (Figure 2). Also, there are many enzymes smaller than 10 nm that exhibit self-propulsion properties, such as catalase and urease. Metallic and enzymatic nanomotors are examples of active matter at the nanoscale and we measure their mobility by fluorescence microscopy or more recently, by using tiny electrodes (Figure 3) . Active matter at the nanoscale has potential applications in active transport on small scales, such as for drug delivery in nanomedicine. Chemically-propelled nanomotors could give new insight into locomotion and self-organisation of living organisms and help discover new ways of converting energy into motion yet unseen in nature. As more researchers delve into active matter physics, we will be able to discover new rules that govern the behaviour of these systems, and, who knows, we could be closer to Shelley’s dream of bringing a spark of life to matter.
By Dr. Ibón Santiago. Postdoctoral Research Assistant at the University of Oxford. SRUK Oxford Constituency.
More information in:
 R. Brown, A Brief Account of Microscopical Observations … on the Particles Contained in the Pollen of Plants; and on the General Existence of Active Molecules in Organic and Inorganic Bodies. 1828. Access here
 A. Einstein, “On the motion of small particles suspended in liquids at rest required by the molecular-kinetic theory of heat”, Annalen Der Physik 17 (1905). Access here
 T. Sanchez, D. T. N. Chen, S. J. DeCamp, M. Heymann, and Z. Dogic, “Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter,” Nature, vol. 491, no. 7424, pp. 431–+, 2012. Access here
 J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine, and P. M. Chaikin, “Living Crystals of Light-Activated Colloidal Surfers,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6122, pp. 936–940, 2013. Access here
 Li, Jinxing, Isaac Rozen, and Joseph Wang. “Rocket science at the nanoscale.” ACS nano 10.6 (2016): 5619-5634. Access here
 L. Jiang*, I. Santiago*, and J. Foord, “Observation of nanoimpact events of catalase on diamond ultramicroelectrodes by direct electron transfer,” Chem. Commun., vol. 53, no. 59, pp. 8332–8335, Jul. 2017. Access here